生成画像の「元画像を再現する確かさ」と「変化への弱さ」を分けて測る

ELVAE: Evidential Learning-Based Variational Autoencoder for Uncertainty-Aware Generation

ELVAE places an input-dependent normal--inverse-gamma (NIG) hierarchy at each VAE latent coordinate, separating location uncertainty $u_{\mathrm{epi}}=β/[ν(α-1)]$ from conditional variability $u_{\mathrm{var}}=β/(α-1)$. The marginalized latent law, however, identifies only the three quotient coordinates $(γ,α,c)$ with $c=β(1+1/ν)$; reconstruction is blind to one $(ν,β)$ fiber direction. A companion theoretical analysis shows that the complete NIG prior and forward KL select a unique prior-relative canonical representative on each fiber, so canonical inverse allocation is not a fourth independent information channel. Empirically, trained inverse evidence $1/ν$ remains the strongest sensitivity-ranking score. At $τ_{\mathrm{epi}}=1$, the three-seed mean high/low-$u_{\mathrm{epi}}$ semantic-transition ratios are 1.98 on MNIST and 1.66 on Fashion-MNIST, falling to 1.33 and 1.16 under scale-matched controls. In the 20-draw MNIST component study with equal per-anchor perturbation energy, $1/ν$ gives high/low ratios 1.69 and 1.65 under the $u_{\mathrm{epi}}$ and $u_{\mathrm{var}}$ fields and 1.69 (95\% interval 1.45--1.97) under a geometry-free isotropic field, whereas $u_{\mathrm{var}}$ reverses the isotropic ordering to 0.76. Under the experimental prior, canonical $1/ν_{\mathrm{can}}$ is a strictly increasing transform of $T=c/[α(γ^2+2)]$ and is bounded above by $3+\sqrt{10}$. Thus ELVAE exposes a controllable sensitivity mechanism whose trained four-output realization is operationally informative, while the exact reconstruction-visible information remains three-dimensional and baseline image quality is a separate question.